The desirability of holding simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas has been discussed at various levels. A considered view is that simultaneous elections will ...
The desirability of holding simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas has been discussed at various levels. A considered view is that simultaneous elections will not only keep alive the enthusiasm of voters, but will also result in huge savings to the public exchequer as well as avoiding repetition of administrative effort. It is also expected to control the expenses of political parties. Simultaneous elections will also avoid repeated enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct which affects administrative actions by the government.
President of India, His Excellency Shri Pranab Mukherjee has also expressed his views on the desirability of holding simultaneous elections. Speaking at a recent function, The President said that “With some election or the other throughout the year, normal activities of the government come to a standstill because of code of conduct. This is an idea the political leadership should think of. If political parties collectively think, we can change it.... The Election Commission can also put in their idea and efforts on holding the polls together and that will be highly beneficial”
Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi has spoken several times on considering the feasibility of holding simultaneous Lok Sabha and state assembly elections. In two recent TV discussions, the Prime Minister reiterated this idea and invited a national debate on the issue.
Debate on the Issue - A Brief History
In India, simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha (House of The People) and Vidhan Sabhas (State Legislative Assemblies) were organized in the years 1951-52, 1957, 1962 and 1967. Thereafter, however, the schedule could not be maintained and the elections to the Lok Sabha and the Vidhan Sabhas have still not been realigned.
The next General Election to the Lok Sabha is scheduled for 2019. Elections for the Vidhan Sabhas of 5 States are scheduled for 2017, for 13 States in 2018, for 9 States in 2019, for 1 State 2020 and the remaining are scheduled for 2021.
The issue of simultaneous elections was debated by the Law Commission in its 107thReport in 1999 (Reform of Electoral Laws) , where in it was mentioned that – “The rule ought to be one election once in five years for Lok Sabha and all Legislative Assemblies” ( Para 7.2.1.1 of the Report). Recently, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice presented its 79th Report on ‘Feasibility of holding Simultaneous Elections to the House of People (Lok Sabha) and State Legislative Assemblies’ on 17th December 2015.
Several structural changes will need to be done in case a decision is made to conduct simultaneous election, including possibility of Constitutional amendments to Articles 83, 172, 85 and 174 to streamline the process.
Seventy Ninth Report Parliamentary Standing Committee for PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICEMyGov Discussion
MyGov invites citizens, Parliamentarians, Members of Legislative assemblies and councils, constitutional experts, academics experts, bureaucrats, social media influencers, Think Tanks and all other interested people to give their considered view on the subject. The issues that can be considered while formulating a view are (only an indicative list and not exhaustive):
1. Is it desirable to hold simultaneous elections? What are the pros and cons?
2. If simultaneous elections are held, then for the first time what happens to assemblies whose scheduled tenure either ends before or after the proposed date of holding elections?
3. Should the term of Lok Sabha and assemblies be fixed?
4. What would happen in case by-elections are necessitated in between terms?
5. What happens in case the ruling party or coalition loses majority in between term, either in Lok Sabha or in State assemblies?
You may submit your opinion by either writing in the comment box below, or by attaching a PDF document, or through a Youtube video.
The last for submitting your opinion is 15th October, 2016.
No doubt simultaneously holding elections is the solution for the growth
It wil save resources for the country,more coordinated action from states and central governments leading to better utilisation of Bureaucracy,s time and of all our political leaders
Main problem is our system which demand caste system in politics not development.
We should replace surnames yadav sharma Patel etc. By FATHER'S first name. Caste system should be vanished. Then we can achieve more better leaders for INDIA WE WANT 100 MODIs in parliament.
Then we will become superpower.
And all the problems will resolved early as possible.
Single election single form for sate and central election. municipal elections can be separate. Save money time and resources.
Indian voters are wise enough to vote in one attempt and do not need to be brainwashed for each election separately.
Times are changing. We have moved on from manual counting of votes to using voting machines. We must move with times. The cost to exchequer needs to be reduced and hence we must try and implement the following -
1. ONE election for Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas
2. Debate on TV and social medis instead of large rallies. and
3. Elecronic system of voting using aadhar cards identifications and login from homes instead of going to booths ( it costs so much to man the booths, cost to EC must reduce)
Simultaneous elections is the need of the hour,but it is a complex issue .Every pros and cons should be looked upon.
It would save lot of money.Nothing tobworry about code of conduct all the time for govts.Corrupt practises will decrease.
Along with #SimultaneousElections we can also have a strict, transparent, honest online system to sit at home, log in with Adhaar and cast your vote and the counting will go simultaneously, declaring the results then and there.
Time, Money, Democracy everything will be enriched and become marvellously efficient.
Well you can calculate it's pros and cons and work with them before implementation.
Proud to see the citizen-govt engagement. Will be proud if the citizens are literally heard.