Home | MyGov

Accessibility
ऐक्सेसिबिलिटी टूल
कलर एडजस्टमेंट
टेक्स्ट साइज़
नेविगेशन एडजस्टमेंट

Desirability and Feasibility of Changing the Financial Year

Desirability and Feasibility of Changing the Financial Year
आरंभ करने की तिथि :
Aug 24, 2016
अंतिम तिथि :
Oct 01, 2016
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
प्रस्तुतियाँ समाप्त हो चुके

The Government of India has appointed a Committee chaired by Dr. Shankar Acharya, former chief economic adviser, to examine the desirability and feasibility of having a ‘new ...

The Government of India has appointed a Committee chaired by Dr. Shankar Acharya, former chief economic adviser, to examine the desirability and feasibility of having a ‘new financial year’. Other distinguished members of the Committee are Shri K M Chandrasekhar, former Cabinet Secretary, Shri PV Rajaraman, former Principal Finance Secretary, Tamil Nadu and Dr. Rajiv Kumar, Senior Fellow Centre for Policy Research.

Presently, the financial year followed by governments in India runs from 1st April to the following 31st March.

This issue was last examined by the L K Jha Committee in 1985, whose recommendation to move to a financial year of January 1- December 31 (for Central and State Governments) was then not accepted by the then Government.

There are many arguments for and against the change in financial year which revolve around issues of budget and cash management by government, seasonality of government revenues and expenditure, impact of Monsoon on budget forecasting, working season, timelines involved in the legislative cycle of passage of Budget by the Parliament, international comparability of fiscal statistics, aligning government’s financial year with year for tax assessment and corporate accounting purposes. Some arguments are less on the intrinsic merit or demerit of the change but rather on the timing of the change when the change coincides with other developments impacting businesses.

This Discussion Forum seeks to invite inputs from everyone interested in this issue.

We welcome your comments, suggestions, information and documents on the Committee’s Terms of Reference and issues related to it. Please provide these latest by 30th September, 2016.

फिर से कायम कर देना
816 सबमिशन दिखा रहा है
vishal vijay panchalwar
vishal vijay panchalwar 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
If we want to become developed country then our gov wants money for doing many schemes but many people donot pay tax to gov but taxes the maximum amount of tax is coming from infrastructure companies in China the maximum tax is coming from builders but in our country we does not pay tax to gov many builders and consumers buy a property 22 lacks but they show leagaly show that they buy it @ 12 lacks and big amount of tax is does paid to our gov due to this we must need to do some changes in rules
gks raja
gks raja 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
Yes, it is desirable to change the financial year to Jan 1st to Dec 31st. When we are already following the present calendar system for all purposes, it is sensible to go financial year also the calendar year. I appreciate the initiative taken by the government and this improve uniformity within all state governments and central government. If this change also takes place alongside of GST Bill, it will be a really desirable change. Please do it.
Bhaskaran Vazhuthanayil
Bhaskaran Vazhuthanayil 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
Its a good idea to change the fiscal year to 1st.Jan. In the meantime the state budget shall remain April 1st. so that they can incorporate central allotments with their own budget.Moreover, budget shall be for three years, not a combined but, individual for each year.This will eliminate the chance for hoarding and other malpractices like budget leaking etc.This will make pre-planned budget. In the current year, necessary modifications could be made in the already declared budget, if needed.
Girish Padia
Girish Padia 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
Can we read the report of L K. Jha committee? This will help reader to understand committee recommendation and why government rejected the proposal in 1985. I am software person and I always wonder the logic of financial year from April to March! It is very difficult to have financial year as 2015-2016, 2016-2017, etc. I more wonder when Income Tax department use assessment year which is one year advanced to financial year. It is confusing. I would vote for calendar year = financial year.
Venkataraman veera
Venkataraman veera 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
It is a nice step in the right direction as the budgets formed will be realistic taking into consideration our harvest season patterns and the erratic monsoons. It will reduce the number of supplementaries in our states and the center. It will also bring about ease of transactions in our trade with different countries under the present liberalized world economy.
ARJUN C
ARJUN C 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
This proposal should be read along with the proposal to advance budget to Jan so that voting and discussion will be over by April 1st, the begining of the FY. If the FY is changed to Jan then the current problems associated with the Vote-on-account like delays in project funding,rush of expenditure towards last month etc will persist..so these issues may be factored in while advancing the FY..