भारत सरकार
हिन्दी language

Home | MyGov

Accessibility
ऐक्सेसिबिलिटी टूल
कलर एडजस्टमेंट
टेक्स्ट साइज़
नेविगेशन एडजस्टमेंट
Screen Reader iconस्क्रीन-रीडर्स
Menus
Sticky Menu

Stakeholder Consultation on Proposed Changes to GST Laws

आरंभ करने की तिथि :
Jul 10, 2018
अंतिम तिथि :
Jul 17, 2018
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
प्रस्तुतियाँ समाप्त हो चुके

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, ...

In order to engage with the stakeholders and invite comments from the public at large, the Department of Revenue has decided to make available the proposed amendments in CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 in the public domain. The draft proposals for amendments can be seen here. You are invited to submit your comments/feedback on the draft proposals for amendments through this discussion on MyGov.in. To facilitate the analysis of the comments / feedback, you are requested to add a hashtag to your comments. The hashtags should be added using the following scheme:

Use the hashtag #AmendmentSrNo1 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no.1 of the draft proposals,#AmendmentSrNo2 for comments pertaining to amendment detailed at serial no. 2 of the draft proposals, etc.

In case you have more than one suggestion to offer, you may find it convenient to type out your comments in a separate document, with hashtags specifying the Serial No. for which the comments are being given.

Last date of submission is 16th July, 2018

फिर से कायम कर देना
1285 सबमिशन दिखा रहा है
Suneel kumar kota
Suneel kumar kota 7 साल 11 महीने पहले
Respected Sir, our representation is here with submitted through attachment and request your highness to do the needful thanks and regards sir Suneel Kumar kota Chairman of Web Committee Chairman of Regional Committees Andhra Pradesh Tax Practitioners and Consultant Association.
mygov_153163055253042671.pdf
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Bharat Bhushan
Bharat Bhushan 7 साल 11 महीने पहले
TCS on e commerce operators.India applied LTCG on equity and since then FII are pulling out of India.Vodafone tax case was settled By Honorable Supreme Court of India but India made Retrospective amendment in Income Tax laws and Vodafone went for arbritration. These are classical example of mindset of India tax authorities whereby revenue maximization is the only goal.But in my view revenue collection by just and fair means should be the goal of Indian tax authorities.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Satvika
Satvika 7 साल 11 महीने पहले
Sir , I am a small dealer registered under Gst ,earlier not filed returns due to lack of knowledge about Gst ,and some accountants also made some mistakes while filing returns ,here small dealers are fearing what will happen due to that mistakes and late fee for not filing returns becomes huge (45000),please allow one year of filing without late fee and also please allow revised option to rectify our mistakes what we made earlier, with that all the small dealers also becomes regular.please......
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Rahul Parashar
Rahul Parashar 7 साल 11 महीने पहले
#AmendmentSrNo11 Possible misuse and consequent loss of revenue: • There is no link between nature of goods supplied and the nature of services allowed. • There is no link between the value of services allowed to be provided and the value of goods sold. This could result in an assessee obtaining GST registrations in 3 different states, say NOIDA(UP), Gurugram(Hary ana) and Delhi and hence obtain a right to charge merely 1% onservice value up to Rs. 15 lacs by selling merely Rs. 100 goods.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Rahul Parashar
Rahul Parashar 7 साल 11 महीने पहले
#AmendmentSrNo5 #AmendmentSrNo6 Impact on services related to immoveable property: • Till now the levy of GST on services related to “immoveable property” was derived from 7(1)(d) read with Schedule II 2(a) and (b) . • “Immoveable property” is excluded from the definition of “goods”[Sec 2(52)] and since “service” [Sec 2(102)] is defined to mean anything other than goods etc., it leads to an absurd interpretation of “immoveable property” being classified as a service if levy of GST onservice
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
om praash modi
om praash modi 7 साल 11 महीने पहले
1. Returns needs to be modified to include supply and inward supply details in one return. Time for filing should be 30 days from end of quarter and 15 days from end of month. Payment should, if needed, be made as per return. Multiple returns are costing more time and money for tax payers. 2. Transaction details should be partywise (consolidated) information instead of bill wise. 3. Interest on reversal of credit should be revisited. Only in cases where a demand is created due to reversal.
नापसन्द (0)
जवाब दो
स्पैम की रिपोर्ट करें
Sticky Menu