Home | MyGov

Accessibility
ऐक्सेसिबिलिटी टूल
कलर एडजस्टमेंट
टेक्स्ट साइज़
नेविगेशन एडजस्टमेंट

Desirability and Feasibility of Changing the Financial Year

Desirability and Feasibility of Changing the Financial Year
आरंभ करने की तिथि :
Aug 24, 2016
अंतिम तिथि :
Oct 01, 2016
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
प्रस्तुतियाँ समाप्त हो चुके

The Government of India has appointed a Committee chaired by Dr. Shankar Acharya, former chief economic adviser, to examine the desirability and feasibility of having a ‘new ...

The Government of India has appointed a Committee chaired by Dr. Shankar Acharya, former chief economic adviser, to examine the desirability and feasibility of having a ‘new financial year’. Other distinguished members of the Committee are Shri K M Chandrasekhar, former Cabinet Secretary, Shri PV Rajaraman, former Principal Finance Secretary, Tamil Nadu and Dr. Rajiv Kumar, Senior Fellow Centre for Policy Research.

Presently, the financial year followed by governments in India runs from 1st April to the following 31st March.

This issue was last examined by the L K Jha Committee in 1985, whose recommendation to move to a financial year of January 1- December 31 (for Central and State Governments) was then not accepted by the then Government.

There are many arguments for and against the change in financial year which revolve around issues of budget and cash management by government, seasonality of government revenues and expenditure, impact of Monsoon on budget forecasting, working season, timelines involved in the legislative cycle of passage of Budget by the Parliament, international comparability of fiscal statistics, aligning government’s financial year with year for tax assessment and corporate accounting purposes. Some arguments are less on the intrinsic merit or demerit of the change but rather on the timing of the change when the change coincides with other developments impacting businesses.

This Discussion Forum seeks to invite inputs from everyone interested in this issue.

We welcome your comments, suggestions, information and documents on the Committee’s Terms of Reference and issues related to it. Please provide these latest by 30th September, 2016.

फिर से कायम कर देना
816 सबमिशन दिखा रहा है
great patriot
great patriot 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
China will only try to win a war by backstabing or other illegal methods.they utter big threats but will do nothing openly as they know the moment they do it they r finished.so when there is any emergency or weakness India shud expect and be ready on all fronts to face an attack from china.they will use diplomatics weaknesse and see the timmings when it can happen.it uses psychological warfare,an army uses psychological warfare only when it is in a weak situation even chanakya said once.
great patriot
great patriot 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
China is using psychological warfare.i have only heard tat they possess stealth fighters,hypersonic weapons but only on media n only a few pics.in their parade also they showcase each and everything in one single day to make it look massive.and it only conducts missile test but cannot even fire a bullet as it knows it will be its end the moment they do it.they will attack at a time least expected like 1962 during cuban missile crises when both us and ussr where busy.they r cowards.
bhushan shivaji chikhalikar
bhushan shivaji chikhalikar 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
let us join international community in true spirit. in my view financial tear must be same as calendar year.but we should do it by reducing one month every year than reducing entire quarter. means from next year it should be march to feb then feb to jan & like wise. thanx.
Madan Mohan Sharma
Madan Mohan Sharma 9 साल 10 महीने पहले
1- If the Financial Year is Jan to Dec it puts us in same Year zone as Europe and Americas. International accounting becomes easier. 2 - Jan to Dec financial year also feels more comfortable as we complete it in the same year rather than the current way where it goes over two years. 3 - Lastly The Financial Year 1st April to 31st March is a colonial baggage and should be done away with.